Brazilian (in) adequacy for transitional justice concept: The ADPF n. 153 case Gomes Lund
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/2318-8081.16.18Keywords:
ADPF 153, Amnesty, Conventionality Control, Gomes Lund, Transitional Justice.Abstract
The main purpose of this work is to study through the deductive method and based on the historical procedure, the adaptation of Brazil to adequate itself to the international concept 'Transitional Justice', particularly as to the validity of the Federal Law No. 6683 of 1979 – the ‘Amnesty Act’. To this end, it promotes a debate between two conflicting decisions: the ‘Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental’ No. 153, issued by the Brazilian Supreme Court, and the Gomes Lund and Others vs. Brazil, adopted by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. From the colliding understanding adopted by these courts, there are newer possibilities to discuss and research the criminal punishment of crimes committed by state agents during the Brazilian dictatorship. After all, in accordance to the Brazilian doctrine, Brazilian law should only be applied if not conflicting with international human rights treaties signed by the State, denoting, at the end, Brazil’s inconsistency on the subject.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit their manuscripts for publication in the “REDES” Magazine agree to the following terms:
The authors claim to be aware that they retain copyright by giving “REDES” the right to publish.
The authors declare to be aware that the work submitted will be licensed under the Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution License which allows article sharing with acknowledgment of authorship and publication in this journal.
The authors declare to be aware that by virtue of the articles published in this journal have free public access.
The authors declare, under the penalty of the law, that the text is unpublished and original and that they are aware that plagiarism has been identified, plagiarized authors will be informed - willingly, to take legal action in the civil and criminal sphere - and, plagiarists will have their access to the magazine blocked.
The authors state that - in case of co-authoring - all contributed significantly to the research.
Authors are obliged to provide retractions and (or) corrections of errors in case of detection.
The authors are obliged not to publish the text submitted to “REDES” in another electronic journal (or not).
The Electronic Journal Law and Society - REDES - is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.Based on work available at "http://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/about/submissions#copyrightNotice".
Permissions in addition to those granted under this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/.