The refutation of Dworkin to the skepticism as to pretensions juridically tutored
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v5i1.3463Keywords:
Judicial Acting, Legal Pragmatism, Richard Posner, Ronald Dworkin, Law as Integrity.Abstract
This article is a result of scientific research conducted about a theory belonging to the field of Philosophy of Law entitled Legal Pragmatism, specifically as to its main characteristics about the judicial acting from the perspective of the indoctrinator and US judge Richard Posner as well as the criticism made by the also philosopher of law Ronald Dworkin on some aspects of the thought of Posner, especially the aspect of skepticism as to pretensions juridically tutored. In addition, it presents the solution developed by Dworkin for what he believes are inconsistencies presents in the Legal Pragmatism of Posner, that would be the law as integrity. Analyzes of THE theoretical way the thought of these two authors, both appropriating some of his major works which focus on the judicial acting. Considers, lastly, that Dworkin does not ignore the Legal Pragmatism as a whole, having succeeded in extracting the best aspects of this theory in order to reach a solution that, in his view, would be more consistent and complete to legal practice.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit their manuscripts for publication in the “REDES” Magazine agree to the following terms:
The authors claim to be aware that they retain copyright by giving “REDES” the right to publish.
The authors declare to be aware that the work submitted will be licensed under the Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution License which allows article sharing with acknowledgment of authorship and publication in this journal.
The authors declare to be aware that by virtue of the articles published in this journal have free public access.
The authors declare, under the penalty of the law, that the text is unpublished and original and that they are aware that plagiarism has been identified, plagiarized authors will be informed - willingly, to take legal action in the civil and criminal sphere - and, plagiarists will have their access to the magazine blocked.
The authors state that - in case of co-authoring - all contributed significantly to the research.
Authors are obliged to provide retractions and (or) corrections of errors in case of detection.
The authors are obliged not to publish the text submitted to “REDES” in another electronic journal (or not).
The Electronic Journal Law and Society - REDES - is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.Based on work available at "http://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/about/submissions#copyrightNotice".
Permissions in addition to those granted under this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/.