The principle of the non-forfeiture and its constitutional interpretation

Authors

  • Ricardo Cavedon Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/963

Keywords:

Constitutional interpretation, Limitations, Postulates, Principle of non confiscation, Prohibition of excesses, Proportionality, Property, Reasonableness

Abstract

By virtue of the historic running, the legal system imposed to the concept of property to suffer some mutations in its normative structure, consistent with the actuality and the collective interest. It is, in this sense, the right to property today achieved by certain limitations – dictated both to its exercise as in its inner sphere (it is the case of the social function of property); and to certain privations (in the case of expropriation, by means of fair and prior compensation) and of the confiscation with no compensation. So, gradually one will get to go along with the foundations for a systematic and teleological interpretation of the principle of non-evolutionary forfeiture in Brazilian tax law,   allying it, in this attempt, to the criteria of reasonableness, of the proportionality and prohibition of excesses. The interpretation of article 150, subsection IV, of the Federal Constitution, must be more persistent and present in judicial activity and on contemporary doctrine.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-14

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who submit their manuscripts for publication in the “REDES” Magazine agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors claim to be aware that they retain copyright by giving “REDES” the right to publish.

  2. The authors declare to be aware that the work submitted will be licensed under the Creative Commons Non-Commercial Attribution License which allows article sharing with acknowledgment of authorship and publication in this journal.

  3. The authors declare to be aware that by virtue of the articles published in this journal have free public access.

  4. The authors declare, under the penalty of the law, that the text is unpublished and original and that they are aware that plagiarism has been identified, plagiarized authors will be informed - willingly, to take legal action in the civil and criminal sphere - and, plagiarists will have their access to the magazine blocked.

  5. The authors state that - in case of co-authoring - all contributed significantly to the research.

  6. Authors are obliged to provide retractions and (or) corrections of errors in case of detection.

  7. The authors are obliged not to publish the text submitted to “REDES” in another electronic journal (or not).

 

The Electronic Journal Law and Society - REDES - is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.Based on work available at "http://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/about/submissions#copyrightNotice".

Permissions in addition to those granted under this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/.