World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): validation for adults with low vision

Authors

  • Angelica Emboaba Salomão Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4348-9745
  • Camila Ferreira Leite Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Fisioterapia; Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-8845
  • Shamyr Sulyvan Castro Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Fisioterapia; Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7899
  • Suraya Gomes Novais Shimano Departamento de Fisioterapia Aplicada, Instituto de Ciência da Saúde, Federal Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brasil.
  • Laís Sampaio Silveira Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física (Mestrado). Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-8480
  • Karina Pereira Departamento de Fisioterapia Aplicada, Instituto de Ciência da Saúde, Federal Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba/MG, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-1004

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/sdh.v9i1.6295

Keywords:

WHODAS 2.0, Validation study, Low vision

Abstract

Introduction: The validation process involves checking the psychometric properties of a given instrument to verify its use in a specific population.

Objective: Validate the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), for its applicability in the adult Brazilian population with low vision.

Material and methods: 125 people with low vision, mean age 49.9 years (± 1.3) and male prevalence (59.2%), registered in visually impaired associations in the cities of Uberlândia-MG, Uberaba-MG were evaluated and Ribeirão Preto - SP. For the validation of convergent / divergent criteria, WHOQOL-Abbreviated was used. Three stages of interviews were carried out, with an interval of seven days.

Results: In the 1st evaluation stage, there was moderate validation of internal consistency in most domains (??0.64), except in school and work activities (? = 0.14). For the validation of the convergent and divergent criterion type, there was a moderate significant correlation between some of the WHODAS 2.0 domains with the WHOQOL-Abbreviated domains. In the 2nd and 3rd stage 100 people participated, with very good reliability in the test-retest (ICC = 0.69) and excellent reliability in the interevaluators (ICC> 0.82).

Conclusion: WHODAS 2.0 was considered valid for people with low vision, therefore, useful for assessing the functionality of this population.

Author Biography

Angelica Emboaba Salomão, Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro

Mestre pela Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro - Uberaba/MG, Brasil. 

Published

2021-02-26

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais