Standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial: applicability with respect to administrative-law matters of civil service

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v12i3.11977

Keywords:

norm of administrative law, civil service, civil service law, legal rule, case-law of the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the key substantial and procedural standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial enshrined the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 that are applicable with respect to matters of civil service governed norms of administrative law. For this, the method of analysis and systematic research of legal rules should be used, as well as generalization and synthesis of requirements for conformity of civil service law with the afore-mentioned rights and fundamental freedoms of civil servants as they are interpreted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The article shows excerpts from precedent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights indicating scope of applicability and justification of interference with the right to respect for private life in civil service relationships, as well as peculiarities of determination of scope of subject-matter jurisdiction of domestic courts and of legal remedies control in employment-related cases involving civil servants according to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights that concerns the right to a fair trial.

 

References

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. 1950. CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS. 1950. Rome. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 12 JANUARY 2023. OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS V. UKRAINE. Applications nos. 27276/15 and 33692/15. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222138.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 12 JUNE 2014. FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ V. SPAIN. APPLICATION NO. 56030/07. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-145068.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 18 JANUARY 2022. ADOMAITIS V. LITHUANIA. APPLICATION NO. 14833/18. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-215168.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 21 JULY 2011. Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus. Applications nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105766.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 22 NOVEMBER 2016. ERMÉNYI V. HUNGARY. APPLICATION NO. 22254/14. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-168782.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 25 SEPTEMBER 2018. DENISOV V. UKRAINE. Application no. 76639/11. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-186216.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 9 FEBRUARY 2021. XHOXHAJ V. ALBANIA. APPLICATION NO. 15227/19. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-208053.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 9 JANUARY 2013. OLEKSANDR VOLKOV V. UKRAINE. Application no. 21722/11. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-115871.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. KULA V. TURKEY. 19 JUNE 2018. Application no. 20233/06. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184289.

LEHEZA, Yevhen. PISOTSKA, Karina. DUBENKO, Oleksandr. DAKHNO, Oleksandr. SOTSKYI, Artur. The Essence of the Principles of Ukrainian Law in Modern Jurisprudence. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, December, 2022. 342-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(32)2022.ic-15

PRESS UNIT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2023. Work-related rights. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_work_eng.

KORNIIENKO, Maksym, DESYATNIK, Anatolii DIDKIVSKA, Galina LEHEZA, Yevhen and TITARENKО Oleksiy. ‘Peculiarities of Investigating Criminal Offenses Related to Illegal Turnover of Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances, Their Analogues or Precursors: Criminal Law Aspect’. Khazanah Hukum 5, no. 3. 2023. 205–15. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i3.31742.

LEHEZA, Yevhen. YEROFIEIENKO, Larysa. KOMASHKO, Volodymyr. ‘Peculiarities of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Protection in Ukraine under Martial Law: Administrative and Civil Aspects’. Revista Justiça Do Direito 37, no. 3. 2023. 157–72. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v37i3.15233.

LEHEZA, Yevhen Oleksandrovych. FILATOV, Viktor. VARAVA, Volodymyr, HALUNKO, Vira. KARTSYHIN Dmytrо. ‘Scientific and Practical Analysis of Administrative Jurisdiction in the Light of Adoption of the New Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine’. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22, no. 5. 2019. 1–8. https://dspace.oduvs.edu.ua/items/8756f8b6-59a2-4d6b-920c-b68d55efae0e.

LEHEZA, Yevhen, SHCHERBYNA, Bogdan. LEHEZA, Yulia. PUSHKINA, Olena. MARCHENKO. Olesia. ‘Features of Applying the Right to Suspension or Complete/ Partial Refusal to Fulfill a Duty in Case of Non-Fulfilment of the Counter Duty by the Other Party According to the Civil Legislation of Ukraine’. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, no. Sp. 2023. 340–58. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne)2023.ic-17.

SAMIKSHA, Mehra. ‘AI is set to reform justice delivery in India’. INDIAai. Blog Post, 6 April. 2021. Available at: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-is-set-to-reform-justice-delivery-in-india

VOLOBUIEVA, Olena, LEHEZA, Yevhen. PERVII, Vita. PLOKHUTA, Yevhenii. PICHKO, Roman. Criminal and Administrative Legal Characteristics of Offenses in the Field of Countering Drug Trafficking: Insights from Ukraine. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 12, no.3. 2023. 262–77. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.79443.

Published

2024-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles