Standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial: applicability with respect to administrative-law matters of civil service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v12i3.11977Parole chiave:
norm of administrative law, civil service, civil service law, legal rule, case-law of the European Court of Human RightsAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the key substantial and procedural standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial enshrined the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 that are applicable with respect to matters of civil service governed norms of administrative law. For this, the method of analysis and systematic research of legal rules should be used, as well as generalization and synthesis of requirements for conformity of civil service law with the afore-mentioned rights and fundamental freedoms of civil servants as they are interpreted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The article shows excerpts from precedent decisions of the European Court of Human Rights indicating scope of applicability and justification of interference with the right to respect for private life in civil service relationships, as well as peculiarities of determination of scope of subject-matter jurisdiction of domestic courts and of legal remedies control in employment-related cases involving civil servants according to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights that concerns the right to a fair trial.
Riferimenti bibliografici
COUNCIL OF EUROPE. 1950. CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS. 1950. Rome. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 12 JANUARY 2023. OVCHARENKO AND KOLOS V. UKRAINE. Applications nos. 27276/15 and 33692/15. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222138.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 12 JUNE 2014. FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍNEZ V. SPAIN. APPLICATION NO. 56030/07. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-145068.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 18 JANUARY 2022. ADOMAITIS V. LITHUANIA. APPLICATION NO. 14833/18. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-215168.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 21 JULY 2011. Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus. Applications nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105766.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 22 NOVEMBER 2016. ERMÉNYI V. HUNGARY. APPLICATION NO. 22254/14. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-168782.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 25 SEPTEMBER 2018. DENISOV V. UKRAINE. Application no. 76639/11. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-186216.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 9 FEBRUARY 2021. XHOXHAJ V. ALBANIA. APPLICATION NO. 15227/19. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-208053.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 9 JANUARY 2013. OLEKSANDR VOLKOV V. UKRAINE. Application no. 21722/11. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-115871.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. KULA V. TURKEY. 19 JUNE 2018. Application no. 20233/06. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184289.
LEHEZA, Yevhen. PISOTSKA, Karina. DUBENKO, Oleksandr. DAKHNO, Oleksandr. SOTSKYI, Artur. The Essence of the Principles of Ukrainian Law in Modern Jurisprudence. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, December, 2022. 342-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(32)2022.ic-15
PRESS UNIT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2023. Work-related rights. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_work_eng.
KORNIIENKO, Maksym, DESYATNIK, Anatolii DIDKIVSKA, Galina LEHEZA, Yevhen and TITARENKО Oleksiy. ‘Peculiarities of Investigating Criminal Offenses Related to Illegal Turnover of Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances, Their Analogues or Precursors: Criminal Law Aspect’. Khazanah Hukum 5, no. 3. 2023. 205–15. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i3.31742.
LEHEZA, Yevhen. YEROFIEIENKO, Larysa. KOMASHKO, Volodymyr. ‘Peculiarities of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Protection in Ukraine under Martial Law: Administrative and Civil Aspects’. Revista Justiça Do Direito 37, no. 3. 2023. 157–72. https://doi.org/10.5335/rjd.v37i3.15233.
LEHEZA, Yevhen Oleksandrovych. FILATOV, Viktor. VARAVA, Volodymyr, HALUNKO, Vira. KARTSYHIN Dmytrо. ‘Scientific and Practical Analysis of Administrative Jurisdiction in the Light of Adoption of the New Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine’. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22, no. 5. 2019. 1–8. https://dspace.oduvs.edu.ua/items/8756f8b6-59a2-4d6b-920c-b68d55efae0e.
LEHEZA, Yevhen, SHCHERBYNA, Bogdan. LEHEZA, Yulia. PUSHKINA, Olena. MARCHENKO. Olesia. ‘Features of Applying the Right to Suspension or Complete/ Partial Refusal to Fulfill a Duty in Case of Non-Fulfilment of the Counter Duty by the Other Party According to the Civil Legislation of Ukraine’. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, no. Sp. 2023. 340–58. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne)2023.ic-17.
SAMIKSHA, Mehra. ‘AI is set to reform justice delivery in India’. INDIAai. Blog Post, 6 April. 2021. Available at: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-is-set-to-reform-justice-delivery-in-india
VOLOBUIEVA, Olena, LEHEZA, Yevhen. PERVII, Vita. PLOKHUTA, Yevhenii. PICHKO, Roman. Criminal and Administrative Legal Characteristics of Offenses in the Field of Countering Drug Trafficking: Insights from Ukraine. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 12, no.3. 2023. 262–77. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.79443.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Autores que submetem seus manuscritos para serem publicados na Revista REDES concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores declaram ter ciência de que mantém os direitos autorais concedendo à REDES o direito à publicação.
Os autores declaram ter ciência de que o trabalho submetido será licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons atribuição não-comercial que permite o compartilhamento do artigo com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação nesta revista.
Os autores declaram ter ciência que em virtude de os artigos publicados nesta revista tem acesso público e gratuito.
Os autores declaram, sob as penas da lei, que o texto é inédito e original e que têm ciência de que identificada a existência de plágio, os autores plagiados serão informados – para querendo, tomarem as medidas legais nas esferas cível e criminal – e, os autores do plágio terão seu acesso à revista bloqueado.
Os autores declaram que – em caso de coautoria – todos contribuíram significativamente para a pesquisa.
Os autores obrigam-se a fornecer retratações e (ou) correções de erros em caso de eventual detecção.
Os autores obrigam-se a não publicar o texto submetido a REDES em outra Revista eletrônica (ou não).

A Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES - está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Baseado no trabalho disponível em http://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/redes/about/submissions#copyrightNotice.
Podem estar disponíveis autorizações adicionais às concedidas no âmbito desta licença em http://creativecommons.org/.