Judicialization of science and the expansion of the activity of the Judiciary: an analysis in the light of the precedents of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court

Authors

  • Bernardo Brasil Campinho Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) / Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA/RJ)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v8i3.5366

Keywords:

Judicialization of Science, Expansion of the Activity of the Judiciary, Precedentes, Federal Supreme Court of Justice.

Abstract

This work aims to reflect on the use of scientific knowledge as a subsidy for judicial decision making, in addition to expert evidence, seeking to understand how the relationships between legal knowledge and science were built in the decision - making the process of the courts. The objective is to understand how the scientific argument becomes relevant in the context of the constitutional jurisdiction, making the scientific capital object of the judges and other social actors who make up the scene of the Judiciary. From a literature review on the characteristics of the contemporary sciences and the phenomenon of the judicialization of politics as a reference, it was possible to establish a dialogue with the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court and to understand the dimensions of the judicialization of science: as support or subsidy to legal interpretation, as a constitution of the judicial controversy itself and as an inoffensive method of decision. The reciprocal implications between scientific capital and the legal system evidenced a potentialization of uncertainties, but also a possibility of dialogue between law and science. The work was developed from the combination of bibliographical research, including literature reviews on modern science and on the judicialization of politics, and case-law analysis, based on selected judicial precedents from the Federal Supreme Court both in the scope of diffuse judicial review (Action 937 / RJ) and in the concentrated / abstract judicial review (ADI’s 4 and 3510).

Author Biography

Bernardo Brasil Campinho, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) / Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA/RJ)

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Advogado. Professor de Direito Público da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Professor de Ciência Política, Direito Constitucional e Direito Internacional da Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA).

Published

2020-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles