ANÁLISE DE TENDÊNCIAS E PADRÕES EMERGENTES EM MÉTODOS DE ENSINO DE CÁLCULO
UMA ABORDAGEM BIBLIOMÉTRICA BASEADA NO VOSVIEWER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v17i45.12476Palavras-chave:
Educação em Cálculo, Métodos de ensino, Análise Bibliométrica, Visualizador VOS, Tendências EducacionaisResumo
Este estudo visa esclarecer tendências e modelos emergentes nos métodos de ensino de Cálculo por meio da análise de dados bibliográficos. A pesquisa utiliza o banco de dados Scopus em combinação com ferramentas analíticas como VOSviewer e CiteSpace para construir um mapa de conhecimento, analisar colaborações de autores e identificar tópicos de pesquisa importantes. Os resultados da análise fornecem insights valiosos sobre as tendências de desenvolvimento dos métodos de ensino de Cálculo, destacam os principais tópicos de pesquisa e examinam a distribuição de influência entre autores no campo. Essas descobertas oferecem uma compreensão mais profunda da evolução dos métodos de ensino de Cálculo, enfatizando as mudanças e melhorias feitas para atender às crescentes demandas de aprendizagem dos alunos. Com base nesses insights, recomendações práticas são propostas para apoiar educadores, pesquisadores e formuladores de políticas no aprimoramento da eficácia do ensino e no desenvolvimento de estratégias de treinamento que se alinhem às tendências educacionais globais.
Referências
Abdul Aziz Saefudin, Ariyadi Wijaya, & iti Dwiningrum. (2023). Mapping research trends in mathematical creativity in mathematical instructional practices: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4). doi:10.33902/JPR.202322691
Ala’a Zuhair Mansour, Aidi Ahmi, & and Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson Popoola. (2021). Discovering the global landscape of fraud detection studies: a bibliometric review. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 701-720. doi:10.1108/JFC-03-2021-0052
Ana Breda, António Neves, José Dos Santos, & and Zsolt Lavicza. (2023). Utilising a STEAM-based Approach to Support Calculus Students’ Positive Attitudes Towards Mathematics and Enhance their Learning Outcomes. De Gruyter Open Access, 5(1). doi:10.1515/edu-2022-0210
Bendebal Malika, & Djedoui Zahia. (2024). Modern strategies and trends in teaching mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 16(3), 27-33. doi:10.48047/intjecse/v16i3.3
Catherine H. Crouch, & and Eric Mazur. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Association of Physics Teachers, 69(9), 970-977. doi:10.1119/1.1374249
Chaomei Chen. (2014). The CiteSpace Manual. Version 1.01 (pp. 1-84). College of Computing and Informatics.
Dan Liu, Siqi Che, & and Wenzhong Zhu. (2022). Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Academic Mobility Research from 2010 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis Using CiteSpace. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440211. doi:10.1177/21582440211068510
Elyakim Nova Supriyedi Patty, Yorman, & Titik Ceriyani Miswaty. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the use of VOSviewer in educational research: Trends and implications. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 19(1), 61-76. doi:10.18844/cjes.v19i1.9376
Haspekian, M. (2005). An “Instrumental Approach” to Study the Integration of a Computer Tool Into Mathematics Teaching: the Case of Spreadsheets. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(2), 109-141. doi:10.1007/s10758-005-0395-z
Isabel del Arco, Pere Mercadé-Melé, Anabel Ramos-Pla, & Òscar Flores-Alarcia. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of the flipped classroom pedagogical model: Trends and strategic lines of study. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-14. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1022295
Jean McGivney-Burelle, & &Fei Xue. (2013). Flipping Calculus. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(5), 477-486. doi:10.1080/10511970.2012.757571
Justin Halberda, Michèle M. M. Mazzocco, & & Lisa Feigenson. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature DOI: 455(7213), 665-668. doi:10.1038/nature07246
Kai Diethelm, Virginia Kiryakova, Yuri Luchko, & José A. Tenreiro Machado. (2022). Trends, directions for further research, and some open problems of fractional calculus. Nonlinear Dynamics, 107(3), 1-26. doi:10.1007/s11071-021-07158-9
Ljubica Dikovic. (2009). Applications geogebra into teaching some topics of mathematics at the college level. Computer Science and Information Systems, 6(2), 191-203. doi:10.2298/CSIS0902191D
Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, & Keith Morrison. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge, 944 pages.
Markus Hohenwarter, & J. Preiner. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 7(1), 2-12.
Martene L. Stanberry. (2018). Active Learning: A Case Study of Student Engagement in College Calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 959-969. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2018.1440328
Muwen Tang, Tommy Tanu Wijaya, & Xinxin Li. (2025). Exploring the determinants of mathematics teachers’ willingness to implement STEAM education using structural equation modeling. Scientific Reports, 15(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-025-90772-z
N.A. Pendergrass, R.E. Kowalczyk, J.P. Dowd, R.N. Laoulache, & W. Nelles. (2001). Improving first-year engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 33-41. doi:110.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00564.x
Nees Jan van Eck, & and Ludo Waltman. (2023). VOSviewer Manual. Leiden University’s Centre.
Nees Jan van Eck, & Ludo Waltman. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Neslihan Bulut, Mustafa Cevikbas, & and Gabriele Kaiser. (2024). Augmented and Virtual Reality in Mathematics Education: International Symposium on Augmented and Virtual Reality 2022. Teaching Mathematics Through Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality: An Analysis of Recent Advancements Springer, 11-31.
Nilza Humaira Salsabila. (2024). Technology integrated learning optimization in calculus topic in the new normal era. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 5(1), 37-44. doi:10.5281/zenodo.12612888
Qingyan Liu, Nor Liza Ali, & & Huan Yik Lee. (2025). Applying VOSviewer in a bibliometric review on English language teacher education research: an analysis of narratives, networks and numbers. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2449728. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2025.2449728
Rafael Julius, Muhammad Syawal Abd Halim, Normi Abdul Hadi, & Azrul Nizam Alias. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Research in Mathematics Education using Scopus Database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em2040. doi:10.29333/ejmste/11329
Rivaldo Paul Telussa, & Jovial Kaihatu. (2024). Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking in Mathematics: A Study on Brain-Based and Problem-Based Learning. Pedagogik Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 7(1), 53-68. doi:10.24256/pijies.v7i1.4764
Roberto Torres, Darwin Peña-González, & Ellery Chacuto-López. (2024). Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1019. doi:10.3390/educsci14091019
Rosmawati Mohamed, Munirah Ghazali, & Mohd Ali Samsudin. (2020). A Systematic Review on Mathematical Language Learning Using PRISMA in Scopus Database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8), em1868. doi:10.29333/ejmste/8300
Scott W. Bonham, Duane L. Deardorff, & Robert Beichner. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1050 - 1071. doi:10.1002/tea.10120
Senad Orhani. (2024). Deep Learning in Math Education. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4), 270-278. doi:10.47772/IJRISS.2024.804022
Shaobo Huang, & Ning Fang. (2013). Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of predictive mathematical models. Computers & Education
Volume 61, February 2013, Pages 61(1), 133-145. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015
Sirak Tsegaye Yimer. (2022). Effective-Instruction-for-Calculus-Learning-Outcomes-through-Blending-co-operative-Learning-and-Geogebra. Mathematics teaching research journal golden fall 2022, 14(3), 170-189.
Siti Maryam Rohimah. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis using Vos viewer with Publish or Perish of Mathematical Proficiency. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(1), 9-18.
Sourav Saha, Chanwook Park, Stefan Knapik, Jiachen Guo, Owen Huang, & Wing Kam Liu. (2023). Deep Learning Discrete Calculus (DLDC): A Family of Discrete Numerical Methods by Universal Approximation for STEM Education to Frontier Research. Computational Mechanics, 72(2). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2211.16610
Timothy Teo. (2024). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Tran Viet Cuong, & Nguyen Van Tuan. (2021). Project-based Learning Method in Advanced Mathematics for Engineering Students in Vietnam: Experimental Research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 528-539. doi:10.13189/ujer.2021.090312
Uluhan Kurt, & Fatih Sezek. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of Different Teaching Methods on Students’ Engagement and Scientific Process Skills*. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 2021. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.6
Vale Isabel's Lab. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573-588. doi:10.30935/scimath/13135
Van De Tran, Thi Quyen Truong, & Hoang Ngoc Dao. (2024). Factors Affecting the Decision of First-Year Pharmacy Students to Study Pharmacy in Can Tho, Vietnam. SAGE Open, 14(2). doi:10.1177/21582440241245193
Vashti Sawtelle, Eric Brewe, & Laird Kramer. (2012). Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1096-1121. doi:10.1002/tea.21050
Wen Lei, & Xiaoling Liao. (2022). Research Hotspots and Trends of Educational Application of Artificial Intelligence at Home and Abroad in the Past Ten Years – Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace. Paper presented at the ICEMT 2022: 2022 6th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology.
Win Phyu Thwe, & Anikó Kálmán. (2024). Lifelong Learning in the Educational Setting: A Systematic Literature Review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2). doi:10.1007/s40299-023-00738-w
Z. Yasemin Kalender, Emily Marshman, Christian D. Schunn, Timothy J. Nokes-Malach, & and Chandralekha Singh. (2019). Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2). doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020119
Zhenyu Chen, & Xingcun Zhao. (2024). Visualization Analysis of Smart Classroom Research Based on CiteSpace. IEEE Access, 99(1), 1. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3354719
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Do Thi Thanh, Dang Thanh Hong, Nguyen Thi Thanh Van
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Conforme recomendado pelo o Public Knowledge Project, a RCD adota para seus artigos uma licença CREATIVE COMMONS: Atribuição CC BY 4.0.
Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e construam sobre o seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, desde que lhe dêem crédito pela criação original.
Esta é a licença mais adequada oferecida.
Recomendado para a máxima divulgação e uso de materiais licenciados.
