THE CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF GENDER REPRESENTATION IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS OF IRANIAN HIGH SCHOOLS:
THE FAIRCLOUGH MODEL IN FOCUS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i38.11051Keywords:
English textbooks, Critical discourse analysis, Fairclough model, Gender representation, Teacher’s perception, Traditional biased cultureAbstract
The present study adopted an exploratory critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach to examine gender representation in Iranian government mandatory high school ELT textbooks using Fairclough model. Considering the model, female and male characters’ visibility, semantic, domestic, and social roles, activities, and pictorial representations in the textbooks were scrutinized. These factors were described, interpreted, and explained both qualitatively and quantitatively. Additionally, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 30 experienced high school educators and their responses were coded, scrutinized, and interpreted. The findings revealed the permanence of male dominance in the textbooks and that the gender bias in educational materials would have strong socio-cultural effects on students’ mind sets, future careers, and fields of study. The findings highlight the must to address gender inequalities as one of the most crucial socio-cultural concerns of Iran EFL educational textbooks.
References
Afshar, Hassan S. 2015. Analysis and criticism of the English language textbooks of the first grade of junior high school, with an emphasis on critical discourse analysis [In Persian]. Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Sciences 15(3). 109-131.
Ahmad, Mohammad A. & Shah Syed K. 2019. A critical discourse analysis of gender representation in the content of 5th grade English language textbook. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences 8(1). 1-24. http://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989
Aljuaythin, Wafa. 2018. Gender representation in EFL textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A critical discourse analysis approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7(5). 151-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.5p.151
Al Kayed, Murad, Al Khawaldah Sami & Alzubi Mohammad A. 2020. Critical discourse analysis of gender representations in EFL textbooks. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies 9(4). 244-254. http://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2020.94.244.254
Amerian, Majid & Esmaili Fateme. 2014. Gender representation in Iranian high school English textbooks with a critical discourse analysis perspective. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 5(4). 277-289.
Amerian, Majid & Esmaili Fateme. 2015. Language and gender: A critical discourse analysis on gender representation in a series of international ELT textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 4(2). 3-12. http://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.963
Amini, Mohadeseh & Oj Somayeh. 2017. Gender bias in Iranian high school new EFL textbooks (Vision I and II) [In Persian]. In Proceedings of First National Conference on Reviewing Books and Texts of Humanities Sciences. 213-231.
Ansary, Hassan & Babaii Esmat. 2002. Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal 8(2). 35-41.
Azizifar, Akbar. 2009. An analytical evaluation of Iranian high school ELT textbooks from 1970 to 2010. The Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(2). 52-79.
Bahman, Masoumeh & Rahimi Ali. 2010. Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9. 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.149
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Blumberg, Rae L. 2008. The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects 38(3). 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1
Burns, Anne. 1992. Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice. Prospect 7(3), 56-66.
Clark, Romy J. 1995. Developing critical reading practices. Prospect: The Journal of Australian TESOL 10(2). 65–8l.
Dabbagh, Ali. 2016. Gender representation under critical image analysis: The case of Iranian ELT textbooks. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies 4(4). 39-52.
Ellis, Rod. 1997. The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairclough, Norman. 2015. Language and power (3nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Frawley, Timothy J. 2008. Gender schema and prejudicial recall: How children misremember, fabricate, and distort gendered picture book information. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 22(3). 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540809594628
Graham, Alma. 1975. The making of non-sexist dictionary. Newbury House Publishers.
Hall, Mahnaz. 2014. Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(2). 253- 261. https://doi.org 10.4304/jltr.5.2.253-261
Hellinger, Marlis. 1980. For men must work and women must weep: Sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools. Women's Studies International Quarterly 3. 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92323-4
Javani, Tahereh & Tahriri Abdorreza. 2018. The representation of male and female social actors in Prospect EFL Series of Iranian junior high school: A CDA perspective. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies 6(4). 15-23.
Jin, NgY., Ling Chiew, Tong Seng, Ling Lee Y. & Tarmizi Mohd A.A. 2013. An analysis on gender - based language and illustrations in Malaysian secondary schools’ English language and literature textbooks. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 3(18). 115-127.
Le, Thao & Short Megan. 2009. Critical discourse analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Lee, Kang Y. 2009. Treating culture: What 11 high school EFL conversation textbooks in South Korea do? English Teaching: Practice and Critique 1(8). 76-96.
Lee, Rachel & Bathmaker Ann-Marie. 2007. The use of English textbooks for teaching English to ‘Vocational’ students in Singapore secondary schools: A survey of teachers’ beliefs. RELC Journal 38(3). 350-375.
Lee, Jackie F. K. & Collins Peter. 2008. Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks: Some past and current practices. Sex Roles 59(1-2). 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-94146
Lestariyana, Reni P., Widodo Handoyo & Sulistiyo Urip. 2020. Female representation in government-mandated English language textbooks used in Indonesian junior high schools. Sexuality & Culture 24. 1150–1166.
Liu, Kailin. 2016. Prioritizing criteria for evaluating cultural contents in EFL textbooks through APH. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(7). 841-850. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.03
McGrath, Ian. 2002. Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Meyer, Micheal. 2001. Between theory, method and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Ruth Wodak & Micheal Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, (14-31). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n2
Michelis, Ilaria. 2023. Contesting gender: young women and feminist generations in gender-based violence services. Journal of Gender Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2023.2186840
Mineshima, Michio. 2008. Gender representation in an EFL textbook. [Online]. http://www.niit.ac.jp/lib/contents/kiyo/genko/13/14_MINESHIMA.pdf
Miri, Seyed S. 2019. A synchronic and diachronic analysis of gender representation in English textbooks used in Iranian high schools. MSc thesis, Middle East Technical University.
Partridge, Eric. 2006. Usage and abusage. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Porreca, Karen. 1984. Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly 18. 705-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584
Setyono, Budi. 2018. The portrayal of women in nationally-endorsed English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks for senior high school students in Indonesia. Sexuality and Culture 22. 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9526-2.
Siren, Tea. 2018. Representations of men and women in English language textbooks. A critical discourse analysis of Open Road 1-7. Master’s Thesis English Philology Faculty of Humanities University of Oulu.
Sleeter, Christine E. & Grant Carl A. 1991. Race, class, gender and disability in current textbooks. In Michael Apple & Linda Christian Smith (eds.), The politics of the textbook, (78-110). Routledge.
Tomlinson, Brian. 2011. Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, Brian & Masuhara Hitomi. 2017. The complete guide to the practice of materials development for language learning. John Wiley and sons.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1999. Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004001
Ward, Luke & Lucas Sian. 2023. “You’re trying to put yourself in boxes, which doesn’t work”: Exploring non-binary youth’s gender identity development using feminist relational discourse analysis. Journal of Gender Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2023.2172557
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zahra Sadat Hosseini Ahmadabadi, Mahnaz Azad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As recommended by the Public Knowledge Project, RCD adopts for its articles a CREATIVE COMMONS Attribution CC BY 4.0 license.
This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
This is the most appropriate license offered.
Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
