Conservatism and citizen formation: the approach of sexuality in elementary school facing discourse in official documents

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/recc.v24i3.5468

Keywords:

PCN, BNCC, Sexual Diversity.

Abstract

Although sexuality belongs to human development, from its formation to its aging, it is still considered as a taboo within society and a subject of embarrassment for dialogue between people. Thus, it is important to instigate the debate of this theme in the most diverse environments of society and, above all, in school education, which contributes to the preparation of individuals for their insertion in society. However, these indications are effective by adding such a theme in government proposals for education, in order to stimulate the approach of sexuality in the curriculum of educational institutions. Thus, this research aims to analyze how the theme sexuality has been approached in the National Curriculum Parameters (PCN) and the Common National Curriculum Base (BNCC), both for Elementary School, differentiating the approach of sexuality in education. To carry out this qualitative research, a documentary analysis was carried out in the PCN and BNCC - documents in force in 1997 and 2017, respectively, seeking to identify their proposals for the approach to sexuality. The construction of a specific volume of the NCP for the teaching of sexuality, entitled volume 10 - Cultural Plurality and Sexual Orientation. The material indicates the insertion of the theme in a cross-sectional model, that is, throughout the entire elementary school, to cross different curricular subjects. The BNCC, in turn, proposes the inclusion of the theme only for the discipline of Sciences in the 8th grade. In this sense, it is considered important to rethink the forms of presentation of the theme sexuality in Basic Education, given the regression of the approach in the BNCC, limiting to one discipline and a specific school year.

Author Biographies

Francisco Nunes de Sousa Moura, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)

Licenciado em Ciências Biológicas pela Faculdade de Educação de Crateús - Universidade Estadual do Ceará (FAEC/UECE). Mestrando em Educação Brasileira pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (PPGE/UFC) com bolsa FUNCAP. Membro do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Ensino de Ciências (GEPENCI-PPGE/UFC/CNPq).

Raquel Crosara Maia Leite, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)

Licenciada em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU). Mestra em Educação pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (PPGE/UFC) e doutora em Educação pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (PPGE/UFSC). Atualmente é docente associado I da Universidade Federal do Ceará, lotada no Departamento de Teoria e Prática do Ensino na Faculdade de Educação (FACED/UFC). Professora do Programa de Pós-Graduação Acadêmico em Educação Brasileira (PPGE/UFC) e do Mestrado Profissional em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática (ENCIMA/UFC). É uma das líderes do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Ensino de Ciências (GEPENCI-PPGE/UFC/CNPq).

Published

2019-11-29

Issue

Section

Dossiê