A AUTONOMIA DA ESCOLA É EFICAZ PARA O DESEMPENHO ACADÊMICO SUSTENTÁVEL?
AMOSTRA DO EXAME PISA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v16i43.11916Palavras-chave:
Gestão autônoma, Sucesso acadêmico sustentável nas escolas, Análise comparativa dos países da OCDE, Avaliação dos resultados do PISAResumo
Este estudo compara se há uma diferença significativa entre as médias do PISA de países com forte autonomia escolar e países com fraca autonomia escolar. O estudo é um estudo de método de pesquisa misto. O grupo de estudo foi selecionado entre os países da OCDE com autonomia escolar forte e fraca usando uma técnica de contra-amostragem. Os cinco países da OCDE com maior autonomia escolar são Finlândia, Holanda, República Tcheca, Reino Unido e Estônia. Os cinco países da OCDE com a autonomia escolar mais fraca são França, Espanha, Grécia, Turquia e México. Em todos os exames do PISA entre 2006 e 2022, há uma diferença significativa (p<0,05) entre países com forte autonomia escolar e países com fraca autonomia escolar nas pontuações médias de matemática, ciências e leitura. Em países com forte autonomia escolar, os níveis de autodeterminação da escola e de envolvimento dos pais em atividades de aprendizagem ao longo da vida são mais altos do que a média da OCDE. Nos países com pouca autonomia escolar, essas taxas estão abaixo da média da OCDE. Em países com forte autonomia escolar, a colaboração professor-administração, o trabalho em equipe na escola, o monitoramento dos alunos e a participação dos professores em atividades de desenvolvimento profissional são obrigatórios para a administração da escola ou exigidos por lei.
Referências
Aypay, A. (2021). Research methods design and analysis. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
Balcı, A. (2013). Scientific research method. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
Briggs, K.L., & Wohlstetter, P. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351-372. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1076/sesi.14.3.351.15840
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Governing education in a complex world, educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en
Brown, B.R., & Cooper, G.R. (2000). School-based management: how effective is it? NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 77- 85.
Burns, L.T., & Howes, J. (1988). Handing control to local schools. Education Digest. 54(3), 6-9. https://www.proquest.com/openview/8830bb760faa69609ba66ac19a2101c2/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=25066
Caldwell, B.J. (2005). School-based management: educational policy series. Paris: UNESCO Pub.
Cheng, Y.C. (1996). School based decision-making and management, school – effectivenes and school-based management: a mechanism for development. London-Newyork-Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Cotton, K. (1992). School-based management. Portland: School improvement research series. http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/7/topsyn6.html
David, J.L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 45- 53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ388744
Eurostat. (2024). Databases. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Gamage, D.T., Sipple, P., & Partridge, P. (1996). Research on school based management in victoria. Journal of Education Administration, 34(1). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09578239610107147/full/html
Gertler, P., Patrinos, A. H., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2007). Methodological issues in the evaluation of school- based management reforms. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=71e8b1630aba1949383cfa5826bd770248b15eac
Hesse-Biber, S.N., & Leavy, P. (2008). Introduction: Pushing on the methodological boundaries: The growing need for emergent methods within and across the disciplines. In S. N. Hess-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 1-15). New York: Guilford.
Keddie, A. (2015). School autonomy as ‘the way of the future’: issues of equity, public purpose and moral leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(5). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1741143214559231
Mulford, B., Edmunds, B., Kendall, L., Kendall, D., & Bishop, P. (2008). Successful School principal ship, evaluation and accountability. Leading & Managing 14(2): 19-44 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276886132_School_autonomy_as_'the_way_of_the_future'
Neeleman, A. (2019). The scope of school autonomy in practice: An empirically based classification of school interventions. Journal of Educational Change, 20, 31-55. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10833-018-9332-5
OECD. (2018). Education at glance. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2018_eag-2018-en
OECD. (2018). Table D6.1. See Source for more information and Annex 3 for notes. http://dx�doi�org/10�1787/eag- 2018-36-en
OECD. (2022). Education at glance. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2022_3197152b-en
Odden, E.R., & Wohlstetter, P. (1995). Making school-based management work. Educational Leadership, 52(5), 32-36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ497534
Özdemir, S. (2022). Organizational innovation in education. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
Özden, Y. (2000). New values in education. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
PISA. (2006). Data. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264040151-en.pdf?expires=1721063143&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=B17C8881E2C397CFA3D67874AA9EC877
PISA. (2009). What students know and can do? https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264040151-en.pdf?expires=1721063143&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=B17C8881E2C397CFA3D67874AA9EC877
PISA. (2012). Snapshot of student performance in mathematics, reading and science. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/edu/pisa/publications/national-reports/pisa-2012/PISA-2012-results-snapshot-Volume-I-ENG.pdf
PISA. (2015). Excellence and equity in education. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264266490-en.pdf?expires=1721063731&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=C6DB75D208D67A376DE2E54B37BA54A2
PISA. (2018). What students know and can do? https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5f07c754-en.pdf?expires=1721063912&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=1979FCF2593E117EE989674438EFBDFD
PISA. (2022). The sate of learning and equity in education. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/12/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_76772a36.html
Saarivirta, T., & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). School autonomy, leadership and student achievement: reflections from Finland. International Journal of Education Management, 30(7). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0146/full/html
Squires, D.A., & Kranyik, R.D. (1995). The comer program: Changing school calture. Educational Leadership, 53(4), 29-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ517889
Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Şişman, M. (2022). Organizations and cultures. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
Woessmann, L., Luedemann, E., Schuetz, G., & West, M.R. (2009). School accountability, autonomy and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wohlstetter, P. (1995). Getting school based management right: What works and what doesn’t. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20405479
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 İbrahim Çankaya, Servet Balıkçı
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Conforme recomendado pelo o Public Knowledge Project, a RCD adota para seus artigos uma licença CREATIVE COMMONS: Atribuição CC BY 4.0.
Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e construam sobre o seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, desde que lhe dêem crédito pela criação original.
Esta é a licença mais adequada oferecida.
Recomendado para a máxima divulgação e uso de materiais licenciados.
