ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF A CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING MODEL ON CIVICS LEARNING OUTCOMES IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v17i45.12367Keywords:
Culturally ResponsiveTeaching, Civic Learning, EngagementAbstract
This study investigates the effect of a culturally responsive teaching (crt) model on the civics learning outcomes of elementary school students. grounded in both banks’ multicultural education theory and vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, the research explores how integrating students’ cultural backgrounds into the curriculum can improve their civics knowledge, foster positive attitudes toward civic engagement, and enhance classroom participation. a mixed-methods approach was adopted, involving a pretest-posttest design to assess changes in knowledge and attitudes, alongside qualitative data from classroom observations, teacher interviews, and student focus groups. quantitative findings indicate a statistically significant improvement in civics test scores and heightened interest in community participation among students exposed to the crt model. qualitative results complement these findings by highlighting increased student engagement, deeper connections with the material, and greater willingness to discuss civic issues. these outcomes suggest incorporating culturally relevant examples and inclusive pedagogical strategies can bolster civics education for diverse student populations. the study’s limitations include its relatively short duration, limited geographic scope, and small sample size, which may affect the generalizability of the results. future research should consider longitudinal designs, larger samples, and multiple contexts to capture the long-term impact of crt on civic engagement. overall, the results emphasize the potential of culturally responsive practices to reinforce the foundational civic competencies of young learners and underscore the need for teacher preparation programs to prioritize culturally inclusive methods.
References
Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12328
Amani, J., & Mgaiwa, S. J. (2023). Bringing students’ culture into the classroom: perspectives of pre-primary teachers and parents on culturally-responsive instruction in Tanzania. Education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2175617
Antaki, N., Belfield, A., & Moore, T. (2024). Radical Urban Classrooms: Civic Pedagogies and Spaces of Learning on the Margins of Institutions. Antipode, 56(5), 1509–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13039
Asherov, E. A., & Gross, Z. (2024). Community coherence, collective efficacy and civic engagement in student and youth councils: The mediating effect of community resilience. Children and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12856
Ateh, C. M., & Ryan, L. B. (2023). Preparing teacher candidates to be culturally responsive in classroom management. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100455
Balcazar, F. E., Garcia, M., & Venson, S. (2024). Civic engagement training at a school for youth with a history of dropping out. American Journal of Community Psychology, 73(3–4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12727
Body, A., Lau, E., Cunliffe, J., & Cameron, L. (2024). Mapping active civic learning in primary schools across England—A call to action. British Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3975
Cameron, T., Ambrose Brown, V., Katz-Buonincontro, J., Anderson, R. C., Edmunds, A., Land, J., & Livie, M. (2024). “Mirrors and windows:” a case study of educators’ culturally responsive teaching aspirations and syllabi transformation in the arts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104714
Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2023). Engagement in high-leverage science teaching practices among novice elementary teachers. Science Education, 107(2), 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21766
Delaine, D. A., Redick, S., Radhakrishnan, D., Shermadou, A., Smith, M. M. C., Kandakatla, R., Wang, L., Freitas, C., Dalton, C. L., Dostilio, L. D., & DeBoer, J. (2023). A systematic literature review of reciprocity in engineering service-learning/community engagement. In Journal of Engineering Education. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20561
Farley, I. A., & Burbules, N. C. (2022). Online education viewed through an equity lens: Promoting engagement and success for all learners. Review of Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3367
Fliaguine, O., Thuot-Jolicoeur, A., Poulin, F., Denault, A. S., Robitaille, J., Geoffroy, M. C., & Philippe, F. L. (2024). Associations between parental civic engagement, negative beliefs toward civic engagement and youths’ future civic attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12379
Franco, M. P., Bottiani, J. H., Debnam, K. J., Bonifay, W., Pandey, T., Karras, J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2024). The CARES classroom observation tool: Psychometrics of an observational measure of culturally responsive practices. Journal of School Psychology, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101381
Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2019). Implicit and explicit measures of teaching self-efficacy and their relation to cultural heterogeneity: differences between preservice and in-service teachers. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(S1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12475
Harper, F. K., Larsen, J. A., Quinn, M., Caudle, L., Parker, B., & Sadovnik, A. (2024). An unplugged remix of culturally responsive computing for early childhood education. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.41
Holley, K., Davies, S., Rogers, C., Reece, J., Norris, D., & Olinger, J. (2016). Equitable and Inclusive Civic Engagement. In Active People, Healthy Nation. the Kirwan Institute. https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/activepeoplehealthynation/strategies-to-increase-physical-activity/equitable-and-inclusive-access.html
Ialuna, F., Civitillo, S., & Jugert, P. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching, teacher-student relationship and school belongingness: A multi-informant study in ethnically diverse classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100839
Jayadiputra, E., Karim, A. A., Sapriya, S., & Rahmat, R. (2023). The Pancasila and Civic Education curriculum model at 21st century. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i1.49455
Jordan, S. S., Foster, C. H., Anderson, I. K., Betoney, C. A., & Pangan, T. J. D. (2019). Learning from the experiences of Navajo engineers: Looking toward the development of a culturally responsive engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20287
Kehl, J., Krachum Ott, P., Schachner, M., & Civitillo, S. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching in question: A multiple case study examining the complexity and interplay of teacher practices, beliefs, and microaggressions in Germany. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104772
Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Champine, R. B., Warren, D. J. A., & Erickson, K. (2014). Development of civic engagement: Theoretical and methodological issues1. International Journal of Developmental Sciences, 8(3–4), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-14130
Liu, L. (2023). Retracted: The Teaching Effectiveness of Civics Class Based on the Optimization of Integrated Teaching and Deep Learning. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2023, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9816128
Lu, X., & Troyan, F. J. (2022a). Diversity and inclusion of culturally and linguistically diverse students in K-12 Chinese language education. Foreign Language Annals, 55(3), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12639
Lu, X., & Troyan, F. J. (2022b). Diversity and inclusion of culturally and linguistically diverse students in K-12 Chinese language education. Foreign Language Annals, 55(3), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12639
Marino, C., Christens, B. D., Lenzi, M., Galeotti, T., Gaboardi, M., Tubertini, E., Canale, N., Vieno, A., Bonichini, S., Bergamin, M., Cavell, T. A., & Santinello, M. (2025). Perceived Influences of Mentoring on Mentors’ Social Well‐Being: Social Self‐Efficacy and Civic Engagement as Mediators of Long‐Term Associations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70050
Mendenhall, A., Hicks, C., Holder, M., Holmes, C., Jung, E., Ramirez, L., Fairman, M., Bulls, S. T., & Levy, M. (2024). Growing stronger together: Sharing a story of culturally responsive evaluation with indigenous families and communities. Child Abuse and Neglect, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106344
Miri, M. A. (2024). An integrated conceptual model for enhancing refugee education. British Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 1857–1877. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4005
Natarajarathinam, M., Qiu, S., & Lu, W. (2021). Community engagement in engineering education: A systematic literature review. In Journal of Engineering Education (Vol. 110, Issue 4, pp. 1049–1077). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20424
Niki, M. (2024). Does the reduction in instruction time affect student achievement and motivation? Evidence from Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2024.101254
Paizan, M. A., Benbow, A. E. F., & Titzmann, P. F. (2024). Relationship quality in student-teacher-dyads: Comparing student and teacher determinants in multicultural classrooms. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102006
Phan, V., & Kloos, B. (2023). Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1–2), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12643
Pope, A., Cohen, A. K., & Duarte, C. d. P. (2019). Making civic engagement go viral: Applying social epidemiology principles to civic education. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1857
Rüschenpöhler, L. (2024). A review of science teaching approaches for equity focusing on race, class, and religion from the perspectives of Freire’s and Arendt’s theories of education. Science Education, 108(4), 1191–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21868
Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
Thind, R., & Yakavenka, H. (2023). Creating culturally relevant curricula and pedagogy: Rethinking fashion business and management education in UK business schools. International Journal of Management Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100870
Thomas, C. A., & Sebastian, R. (2023). Increasing test scores or fighting injustice: Understanding one district’s culturally responsive teaching certification program. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100235
Yilmaz, M. (2024). Integration of displaced students into the culturally and linguistically different school environment. Review of Education, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70004
Zang, X., & Bai, C. (2022). Markov Model-Based Learning Aid for Students’ Civics Course. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6026875
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nashran Azizan, Deny Setiawan, Hidayat Hidayat, Maulana Arafat Lubis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As recommended by the Public Knowledge Project, RCD adopts for its articles a CREATIVE COMMONS Attribution CC BY 4.0 license.
This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
This is the most appropriate license offered.
Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.