LABORATORY PRACTICUMS AS THE MAIN FORM OF INTEGRATION OF STUDENTS' THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICAL SKILLS

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i38.11054

Palabras clave:

Laboratory activities, Integration, Teaching methods, Practicums, Higher education

Resumen

The purpose of the academic paper is as follows. The formation of students’ experimental skills and research skills in the process of performing frontal laboratory works is one of the main factors in implementing the State Standard of Higher Education. However, a successful solution to this issue is possible only if there is a clear organization of laboratory work and an effective methodology for conducting it. It is obvious that using an independent experiment is extremely useful for students since it provides a systematic approach to implementing productive ways of cognition and forming the basis of learning activities in the process of performing frontal laboratory works. Thus, the main goal of the program is to prove that the development of laboratory skills will be facilitated by a new approach to organizing learning activities based on the simultaneous use of two textbooks: a textbook and a printed laboratory workbook. This research aims to study the features of laboratory practicums as the primary form of integration of students' theoretical and methodological knowledge and practical skills. The research was carried out using a set of complementary methods that ensured the effectiveness and scientific reliability of the research results, namely: theoretical – analysis, systematization and comparison of the provisions of scientific and pedagogical literature to reveal the state of the problem under consideration, to clarify the essence of reflecting and implementing educational technologies in the educational process; generalization and systematization – to substantiate the theoretical fundamentals of the research; pedagogical observation – to diagnose the level of future specialists’ training after a series of activities on the example of analyzing the algorithm of laboratory works. The paper proves that laboratory activities help students to master learning material better. In the process of performing laboratory and experimental works, formulas, calculations, and theoretical provisions that seemed incomprehensible become quite specific. At the same time, many details and facts are revealed that students had no idea about before, and meanwhile, they contribute to the identification and explanation of complex scientific issues. It is emphasized that due to the research nature of laboratory and practical work, students approach them with great interest, gain solid knowledge, are convinced of the reliability of the knowledge they have received, and acquire knowledge that has the power of conviction. It has been proven that the effectiveness of this type of work can be increased by providing informative cards. These include brief theoretical summaries that allow students to quickly find the necessary information (in the context of laboratory activities, this may include help on specific functions, algorithm fragments, structure blanks, and program templates), and clear work structuring. Formalizing the approach and breaking down the solution process into clear, discrete steps makes obtaining specific results quickly and predictably possible. In addition, having such a structure makes it easier for educators to monitor and track the progress of their work. After a long development, laboratory and practical classes have been continuously improved. Today, this form of organizing the educational process in high school is becoming a means of educating future experimentalists, who not only practically prove the probability of many bold hypotheses but also identify new ways of creative search. The efficiency of this type of work can be improved by providing work with informative cards. These are short theoretical summaries that allow students to quickly find the information they need (in terms of laboratory activities, there may be help on specific functions, algorithm fragments, structure blanks, and program templates) and clear structuring of the work. A formalized approach to the solution and the process breakdown into clear, discrete steps makes obtaining certain results quickly and predictably possible. In addition, such a structure makes it easier for educators to monitor and track the progress of their work.

Citas

Auzina, A. O. Holub, H. H., & Vozna, A. M. (2002). Sistema kompleksnoi diagnostiki znan' studenta. [System of Complex Diagnostic of Student's Knowledge]. Lviv, 38 p.

Berezivska, T. (2002). Pedahohichni umovy efektyvnosti seminarskykh zaniat (u vuzi). [Pedagogic conditions of seminar classes effectiveness (in university)]. Bulletin of the CSU. Pedagogical sciences. Vol. 41. P. 9–14.

Bondar, A. D., & Rans'ka, L. A. (1977). Laboratorni i praktychni roboty u vyshchii shkoli [Laboratory and practical work in higher education]. K.: Vyshcha Shkola, 78 p.

Butenko, V. (2012). Shliakhy udoskonalennia navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu u vyshchii shkoli [Ways to improve educational process in high school]. Modern problems of public administration, pedagogy, and psychology: KhNTU Collection of Research Papers. Vol. 2 (7). Kherson, P. 289–293.

Dudikova, L. (2012). Naukovo-doslidnytska diialnist studentiv yak skladova indyvidualizatsii navchalnoho protsesu. [Students' research activity as a component of individualizing the educational process]. Pedagogical almanac. Vol. 16. P. 126–130.

Hudz, S. P., Hnatush, S. O., & Bilinska, I. S. (2009). Mikrobiolohiia: praktykum, testy: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Microbiology: workshop, tests: a textbook]. Lviv: Lviv National University named after Ivan Franko, 228 p.

Kovalenko, O. (1996). Problemy metodychnoi pidhotovky vykladachiv spetsialnykh dystsyplin. [Problems of methodical education of special disciplines teachers]. Pedagogy and psychology. No. 4. P. 173–176.

Kozak, L. (2014). Doslidzhennia innovatsiinykh modelei navchannia u vyshchii shkoli. [Research of innovative teaching models in higher education]. Educational discourse, No. 1 (5). P. 95–104.

Kurlyand, Z. N., Khmeliuk, R. I., Semenova, A. V. & et al. (2005). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Higher Education Pedagogy: A Study Guide]. / edited by Kurlyand, Z. N. 2nd edition, revised and updated. K.: Znannya, 399 p.

Kushnir, V., Kushnir, H., & Rozhkova, N. (2012). Innovatsiinist osvity yak dydaktychnyi pryntsyp. [Educational innovativeness as a didactic principle]. Ridna shkola. No. 6 (990). P. 3–8.

Kushnirenko, N. M., & Udalova, V. K . (2003). Naukova obrobka dokumentiv: pidruchnyk. [Scientific processing of documents: a textbook]. K.: Vikar, 320 p.

Kuzminsky, A. (2005). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Higher school pedagogy: a textbook]. K.: Znannya, 486 p.

Ligum, Yu. S. (2011). Yakist osvity i novitni tekhnolohii navchannia v konteksti intehratsii v yevropeiskyi osvitnii prostir. [Education quality and the latest teaching technologies in the context of integration into the European educational space]. Pedagogy and psychology, No. 2. P. 22–27.

Nahayev, V. M. (2007). Metodyka vykladannia u vyshchii shkoli: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Teaching Methods in Higher Education: A Study Guide]. K.: Center for Educational Literature, 232 p.

On Approval of Higher Education Standard for Specialty 091 "Biology" for the First (Bachelor's) Level of Higher Education: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated November 21, 2019. No. 1457. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/zatverdzeni%20standarty/2019/11/22/2019-11-22-091-B.pdf.

On Approval of Higher Education Standard for Specialty 091 "Biology" for the Second (Master's) Level of Higher Education: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated November 21, 2019. No. 1457. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/vishcha-osvita/zatverdzeni%20standarty/2019/11/22/2019-11-22-091-M.pdf.

Ortynsky, V. L. (2009). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Higher school pedagogy: a textbook]. K.: Center for Educational Literature, 472 p.

Posibnyk do laboratornykh zaniat iz kursu «Zahalna tsytolohiia i histolohiia». [Manual for laboratory classes for the course «General cytology and histology»]. / compiled by: Dzerzhinsky, M. E., Harmatina, S. M. & Danilova, O. V. Kyiv: Phytosociocenter, 2006, 259 p.

Pyatnytska, V., & Pozdnyakova, I. (2003). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen u vyshchii shkoli. [Fundamentals of scientific research in higher education]. K.: Center for Educational Literature, 116 p.

Rezvan, O. O. (2012). Metodyka vykladannia u vyshchii shkoli. [Methods of teaching in higher education]. "Mis'kdruk", 152 p.

Vitvitska, S. S. (2006). Osnovy pedahohiky vyshchoi shkoly: pidruchnyk za modulno-reitynhovoiu systemoiu navchannia dlia studentiv mahistratury. [Basics of Higher Education Pedagogy: a textbook on the modular-rating education system for Master's students]. K.: Center for Educational Literature, 384 p.

Vlasenko, O. O. (2014). Pedahohichna diialnist vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly: teoretychnyi aspect. [Pedagogical activity of a higher education professor: theoretical aspect]. Tavriyskyi vestnik obrazovaniya [Tavrian Education Herald]. No. 3 (47). P. 73–78.

Rzhepetskyi V. P. Laboratory works in the course of general physics for students of technological specialties: [methodical recommendations] / V. P. Rzhepetskyi, M. A. Sliusarenko - Kryvyi Rih: Publishing department of KPI of the State Higher Educational Institution “KNU”, 2014. - Part 1. - 64 p.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-08-11

Número

Sección

Artigos