FEATURES OF PERSONALITY-CENTERED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i37.10969Palabras clave:
Organizing education at the higher educacional institution, personality-centered learning technologies, personality-centered education, development of student's personal traitsResumen
One of the approaches to organizing learning at higher educational institutions, which will contribute to young people’s life self-determination, the development of their subjectivity, cultural identification and socialization, are personality-centered technologies of organizing the educational process. Humanization and democratization of modern society, modern tendencies in the sphere of human socialization require improving the primary directions of transiting to a humanistic paradigm aimed at the individual’s development and self-fulfillment in the social and cultural environment. According to the tendencies outlined, the professional training system at higher educational institutions uses personality-centered educational technologies aimed at ensuring future specialists’ professional and personal efficiency and social competitiveness. The purpose of the academic paper is to determine the features of the primary tendencies in using personality-centered learning technologies at higher educational institutions. Methodology. In the course of the research, the analytical and bibliographic method was used to study the scientific literature on applying personality-centered learning technologies. At the same time, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis of information, system-structural, comparative, logical-linguistic methods, abstraction, and idealization were applied to study and process data. By the way, the research authors also conducted a questionnaire in online mode to practically clarify the most important issues related to personality-centered learning at higher educational institutions. Results. Based on the research results, the primary and most important theoretical aspects of applying technologies of personality-centered learning at higher educational institutions were established. Along with this, the standpoints of scientists and heads of higher educational institutions regarding the key aspects of this issue were also investigated.
Citas
Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education. Educational Sciences, 13, 88. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/education-13-00088.pdf/. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci13010088.
Ali, W. (2020). Online and Remote Learning at Higher Educational Institutions: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic . Higher Education Studies, 10, 3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1259642.pdf. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.
Barakina, E. Y., Popova, A. V., Gorokhova, S. S. & Voskovskaya, A. S. (2021). Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10, 2, 285–296. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311498.
Calonge, S. D., Connor, M., Hultberg, P., Shah, M. A. & Medina-Aguerrebere, P. (2022). Contactless Higher Education: A SWOT Analysis of Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning during COVID-19. Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches (JESMA), 2, 1, 17–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352151950_Contactless_Higher_Education_A_SWOT_Analysis_of_Emergency_Remote_Teaching_and_Learning_during_COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2022.22.
Díaz-García, V., Montero-Navarro, A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. L. & Gallego-Losada, R. (2022). Digitalization and digital transformation in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081595/full. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081595.
Elken, M., Stensaker, B. & Dedze, I. (2018). The painters behind the profile: The rise and functioning of communication departments in universities. Higher Education, 76, 6, 1109−1122. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-018-0258-x. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0258-x.
Ertmer, P. A. & Otternbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2019). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A. & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
Khalid, J., Ram, B. R., Soliman, M., Ali, A. J., Khaleel, M. & Islam, M. S.(2018). Promising digital university: a pivotal need for higher education transformation’, International Journal of Management in Education, 12, 3, 264–75. https://www.tandfonline.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0025&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F13538322.2019.1603611&key=10.1504%2FIJMIE.2018.092868 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2018.092868.
Kostopoulos, G. & Kotsiantis, S. (2022). Exploiting semi-supervised learning in the education field: A critical survey. Advances in Machine Learning/Deep Learning-Based Technologies, 79–94. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-76794-5_5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76794-5_5.
Levitt, H. M. (2018). How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Review PMID, 28, 3, 367–378. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2018.1447708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1447708.
Lim, C. K., Haufiku, M. S., Tan, K. L., Farid Ahmed, M. & Ng, T. F. (2022). Systematic Review of Education Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 14, 13241. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/sustainability-14-13241-v2.pdf. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013241.
Martin-Sardesai, A., Guthrie, J., Tooley, S. & Chaplin, S. (2019). History of Research Performance Measurement Systems in the Australian Higher Education Sector. Accounting History, 24, 40–61 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1032373218768559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373218768559.
Osadchyi, V. V., Valko, N. V. & Kuzmich, L. V. (2021). Using augmented reality technologies for STEM education organization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1, Article 012027. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012027.
Ostapenko E., Kovalenko A., Miziuk V. et al. (2022). Traditional pedagogical approaches in the context of higher education digitalization. AD ALTA: Journal of interdisciplinary research, 12, 2, 44‒47. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120228/papers/A_08.pdf.
Pilonato, S. & Monfardini, P. (2020). Performance Measurement Systems in Higher Education: How Levers of Control Reveal the Ambiguities of Reforms. The British Accounting Review, 52, 100908. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890838920300287?via%3Dihub. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100908.
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L. & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital science and education 2, 923–945. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y.
Skulmowski, A. & Rey, G. D. (2020). COVID-19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2, 212–216. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbe2.201. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.201.
Tømte, C. E., Fossland, T., Aamodt, P. O. & Degn, L. (2019). Digitalization in higher education: mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning. Qual. High. Educ. 25, 98–114. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13538322.2019.1603611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1603611.
Vakaliuk, T. A., Spirin, O. M. Lobanchykova, N. M., Martseva, L. A. & Novitska, I. V., Kontsedailo, V. V. (2021). Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the quarantine organization of educational process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840, 1, Article 012051. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051.
Xie, J. (2019). Review of Chinese and foreign management accounting research based on management accounting research topics and research methods. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 107–19. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=96931. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.712009.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Tetiana Lysenko , Olena Demianenko , Valentina Tsyna , Andriy Tsyna , Maria Tsurkan
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Tal como recomienda el Public Knowledge Project, RCD adopta para sus artículos una licencia CREATIVE COMMONS: Attribution CC BY 4.0
Esta licencia permite que otros distribuyan, remezclen, adapten y desarrollen su obra, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que le atribuyan a usted el mérito de la creación original.
Esta es la licencia más adecuada que se ofrece.
Recomendado para la máxima difusión y utilización de los materiales bajo licencia.
